7 September 2026
The state of Arkansas carried out the execution of Christina Marie Riggs on May 2, 2000, making her the first woman put to death by the state in over 150 years. Riggs, a 29-year-old former licensed practical nurse, was pronounced dead at 9:07 p. m. after receiving a lethal injection at the McPherson Unit in Newport. Her final words were a quiet apology to her family, delivered just moments before the drugs began to flow through her veins. The execution was the culmination of a legal saga defined not by a defendant fighting for her life, but by a woman who spent years demanding the state take it. Christina Riggs did not merely accept her death sentence; she actively campaigned for it. In the years following her conviction for the smothering deaths of her two children, five-year-old Justin and two-year-old Shelby, Riggs fired her appellate attorneys, refused to file appeals, and publicly stated that execution was the only just punishment for her crimes. This unprecedented legal stance transformed her case from a tragic filicide into a national referendum on the intersection of mental illness, personal autonomy, and capital punishment. As the clock struck nine on that Tuesday evening, witnesses behind the glass of the execution chamber watched as Riggs, strapped to a gurney, offered her final statement. According to official records, she said, "I am sorry for the pain I have caused. Please forgive me. I love you all." She then closed her eyes as the lethal chemicals were administered. She was pronounced dead seven minutes later. The final hours of Christina Riggs were marked by a somber, almost serene acceptance that contrasted sharply with the chaos of her life leading up to the murders. Prison officials reported that she spent her last day on death row writing letters, meeting with her spiritual adviser, and praying. She declined a lavish last meal, instead requesting a simple tray of fried chicken, mashed potatoes, and a soft drink, a meal described by corrections officers as "ordinary" and "unremarkable." In the hours before her death, she reportedly told a chaplain that she was not afraid to die, but that she was deeply sorry for the suffering she had inflicted on her family and the families of her children. She expressed no anger toward the legal system that had condemned her, nor did she voice any last-minute doubt about her guilt or her punishment. Instead, she asked for peace for those she was leaving behind, a request that witnesses later described as hauntingly composed The crime that sent Christina Riggs to death row occurred on the night of November 4, 1997, inside a small home in Rogers, Arkansas. At the time, Riggs was a single mother struggling under the weight of severe clinical depression, a crumbling nursing career, and a growing dependency on prescription drugs. Her life, by all accounts, had been spiraling downward for months. She had recently lost her nursing license due to substance abuse, leaving her without income or professional identity. She was facing financial ruin, unstable housing, and the overwhelming fear that she was failing her children. On that fateful night, Riggs put Justin and Shelby to bed, but instead of leaving their room, she set in motion a plan born of what she later described as a twisted belief that death was better than the life she could offer them. Using her medical training, she administered a lethal dose of the antidepressant amitriptyline, known by the brand name Elavil, to both children. After they lost consciousness, she smothered Shelby, the two-year-old, with a pillow. Justin, who was older and larger, did not die immediately from the drug, so Riggs injected him with potassium chloride, a substance she knew could stop the heart. When he still showed signs of life, she smothered him as well. After killing her children, Riggs injected herself with a dose of potassium chloride and lay down beside their bodies, fully expecting to die alongside them. She did not. She lost consciousness but survived, waking hours later to find herself alone in the house with the bodies of her two children. She then called 911 and calmly told the dispatcher what she had done. When police arrived, they found the children's bodies in their beds and Riggs weak but conscious. She did not resist arrest. She did not deny responsibility. She immediately confessed, telling investigators that she had killed her children because she believed they would be better off dead than growing up without her. She described the act not as one of rage or revenge, but as a deeply misguided act of mercy, a belief that mental health professionals would later testify was consistent with severe depressive disorder marked by hopelessness and distorted judgment From the moment of her arrest, Christina Riggs's legal case was anything but typical. She was charged with two counts of capital murder, and the evidence against her was overwhelming. She had confessed fully, in clear and deliberate detail, and she had never requested an attorney during her initial statements. But what truly stunned prosecutors, defense attorneys, and the public alike was her insistence on pleading guilty and seeking the death penalty. She rejected any suggestion of an insanity defense, despite clear evidence of her mental illness. She told her attorneys not to pursue any strategy that might spare her from execution, stating repeatedly that she deserved to die for what she had done. At her trial, which moved swiftly because she refused to contest the facts, prosecutors laid out the medical evidence and the timeline of the murders. Mental health experts testified that Riggs suffered from major depressive disorder and substance abuse, explaining how her thinking had been distorted by hopelessness and despair. However, under Arkansas law at the time, mental illness alone did not excuse criminal responsibility unless it completely eliminated the ability to understand right from wrong. The jury, tasked with deciding her fate, heard Riggs herself ask them to sentence her to death. In 1998, they returned a verdict of guilty on two counts of capital murder and sentenced her to death by lethal injection. Unlike most death penalty cases, there were no emotional outbursts from the defendant, no dramatic claims of injustice. Riggs accepted the sentence calmly, telling reporters that execution was a form of accountability, not escape Following her sentencing, Riggs was transferred to the McPherson Unit, Arkansas's women's prison, where she was housed on death row in near isolation. Her behavior there was, by all accounts, cooperative and introspective. She spent much of her time reading, writing, and praying, and she did not lash out at guards or protest her conditions. But what drew national attention was her continued refusal to appeal her sentence. Time and again, attorneys attempted to intervene on her behalf, arguing that her severe depression rendered her incapable of making a rational decision about her own execution. Courts temporarily halted the process to evaluate her mental competency, but each time, Riggs reaffirmed her position. She wanted the sentence carried out. She gave interviews from death row, speaking openly about her guilt and her belief that execution was deserved. She described the killings as the worst act imaginable and said she did not want sympathy.…
Ali Abulaban, the former TikTok creator known online as “JinnKid,” is serving a sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole following his convictions for the murders of his estranged wife, Ana Abulaban, and her friend, Rayburn Barron, in San Diego, California.
According to prosecutors, Abulaban entered the apartment where Ana Abulaban was staying and fatally shot both Ana and Rayburn Barron. Investigators later recovered evidence including surveillance footage, digital records, and statements that were presented during court proceedings. The case quickly became one of the most closely followed criminal trials involving a social media personality.
Since entering the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation system, Abulaban has begun serving a sentence that offers no possibility of release. While details regarding his daily incarceration are generally not made public, the sentence guarantees that he will remain imprisoned for life unless future legal developments alter the outcome of the case.
