The King ‘desperately misses’ his son Prince Harry and is ‘tiring’ of William’s ‘self-righteous intractability’ in the feud dividing their family, a royal biographer has claimed.
Highly-respected author Tina Brown, who was friends with the late Princess Diana, said Charles ‘wants to re-embrace Harry’ but only if ‘he can keep his mouth shut’.
Ms Brown claimed the King’s 54-minute chat with Harry at Clarence House in London during his UK visit on September 10 was ‘the fulfilment of paternal longing’.
But she warned William remains ‘enraged’ by his ‘treacherous’ brother’s trip to Britain and his attempts to ‘upstage’ him by holding engagements at the same time.
It came as royal sources told the Daily Mail that Prince Harry will never be allowed to return as a ‘half-in, half out’ working royal – and claims he could ‘take some of the load off’ his brother, Prince William, are ‘wide of the mark’.
Insiders reacted angrily on Sunday night to briefings by sources apparently close to the Duke of Sussex that his recent meeting with King Charles, at the end of what his team believes was a hugely successful charity trip to the UK, signalled a ‘thawing of their relationship’ and the ‘acceptance’ of his family ‘back into the royal fold’.
Former Vanity Fair editor Ms Brown has said that the positive reception to Harry’s charity events would have angered the Prince of Wales after his sibling ‘trashed his family’.
She also picked up on how Harry said during an interview while visiting Ukraine after the UK that his ‘conscience is clear’ after speaking out against other royals.
The author said this ‘suggests to his haters the futility of expecting Harry Hotspur to play the old royal game’, when the King wants Harry to stop speaking out.Ms Brown, author of The Palace Papers, wrote in the New York Times: ‘It’s no secret that Charles desperately misses his prodigal son who, in earlier days, was always the fun, ebullient scamp compared with the haughtier, more Hanoverian William.
‘It’s understandably enraging for William to see his treacherous younger brother, who spent the last five years trashing his family on TV and promoting a back-stabbing, best-selling book, bounding around the British charity circuit, doing a well-received side-dash to Ukraine and upstaging the photo ops of William’s own diligent engagements.
‘But Charles, I am told, is tiring of his elder son’s self-righteous intractability in the family feud, and wants to re-embrace Harry – if only he can keep his mouth shut.’
Insiders reacted angrily on Sunday night to briefings by sources apparently close to the Duke of Sussex that his recent meeting with King Charles, at the end of what his team believes was a hugely successful charity trip to the UK, signalled a ‘thawing of their relationship’ and the ‘acceptance’ of his family ‘back into the royal fold’.
The same sources also suggest it could even be the start of a new working model for the ex-royal.
He now apparently plans to return to Britain ‘four or five times year’ for ‘public events’, both for his own charitable initiatives and, potentially, in support of the Royal Family.
Referring to the briefings, however, a royal insider told the Daily Mail: ‘Whoever is behind them seems to have mistaken a brief tea and a slice of cake for the Treaty of Versailles.’
It is also clear there are fears that some in ‘Team Harry’ may be using this month’s ‘baby step’ forwards in the broken relationship between father and son to, perhaps sinisterly, drive a wedge between the King and his elder son and heir.
They have repeated unsubstantiated claims that ‘tensions’ are brewing between the King and Prince William over the apparent lightness of his workload.
One royal insider said: ‘These syrupy briefings from supposed Sussex sources are precisely why The King and Royal family are so hesitant to embark on any road to rapprochement. If the intention is to encourage a rebuilding of trust and relationships, they serve the precise opposite effect’.
Tina Brown’s comments come a week after another provocative intervention in the family feud that has raised fresh questions over William’s work ethic, a claim also denied by a royal source.
